How is truth conceptualized in relation to propositions?

The choice identifying that only propositions can be true or false aligns with a fundamental aspect of logic and philosophy. Propositions are declarative statements that convey information and can be evaluated based on their truth value. This means a proposition will either accurately represent reality (true) or not (false). This dichotomy is a cornerstone of logical reasoning and helps in determining the validity of arguments and the reliability of information.

In contrast, the other options fail to encapsulate the relationship between truth and propositions effectively. The idea that propositions are always true does not allow for the possibility of error or falsehood, rendering it inaccurate. Asserting that truth is irrelevant to propositions negates the foundational concept that propositions are defined by their ability to be categorized as true or false. Lastly, the notion that truth is a subjective judgment overlooks the objective determination inherent in evaluating the truth of propositions. Thus, the stance that only propositions can bear truth values is the most accurate and coherent understanding within the context of logical discourse.